The Roblox Controversy #roblox
The Roblox Controversy #roblox
#Roblox #freeschlep #PlatformResponsibility The Disgusting Truth About Roblox: Ignoring Criminals, Suing a Hero The Real Reason Roblox Sued the YouTuber Who Caught Criminals A PM's View on the Real Cause of the Roblox Tragedy A Must-Read for PMs: How Roblox Designed Danger (Ignoring Safety for Growth)
A YouTuber caught six child predators on Roblox. But instead of a thank-you plaque, Roblox sent him a permanent ban and a lawsuit. This isn't just an isolated incident. It's the ugly truth of a giant platform that ignored children's safety for the sake of growth. In today's video, we'll expose the disgusting truth of why Roblox, which ignored 13,000 reports, tried to silence the YouTuber who caught criminals, and how this tragedy was 'designed' from the very beginning.
#Roblox #ChildProtection #Whistleblowing #Lawsuit #PM #ProductManager #UX #DarkPatterns #TechEthics
A permanent ban and a lawsuit were the rewards for a hero who protected children. The disgusting truth of a massive platform that silenced the person who reported the fire instead of putting it out. Find out more in the full video. #Roblox #FreeSchlep #ShockingTrueStory
Over 800 child sexual abuse lawsuits have been filed against Roblox. This is not a mere accident. It's a 'tragedy by design,' where safety was intentionally ignored to maximize profits.
From the perspective of a PM with 6 years of experience at an AI startup, I'll analyze Roblox's three 'intentional design flaws': a lax sign-up process, an addictive business model, and the outsourcing of safety to cut costs. Let's contemplate together what 'responsibility' means for us who create products.
#PM #ProductManager #UX #Roblox #PlatformResponsibility #ChildProtection #TechEthics
The Roblox tragedy is not a simple accident. It's a 'design problem' where safety was intentionally ignored for growth. For PMs and product planners, understanding the responsibility of platform design is crucial. Find out more in the full video. #PM #DesignEthics #Roblox #DarkPatterns
Do you like Roblox? Even if you don't play it yourself, you probably know it as a game kids love. In the past year, its stock price soared by a staggering 232%, drawing an explosive response. But behind the scenes, Roblox was involved in something terrible and infuriating.
Hello, this is Call It AI, your guide to surviving in the age of AI.
Today, I want to talk about something truly disgusting, yet absolutely necessary to know. A YouTuber, in collaboration with the police, caught six predators targeting children on Roblox, the world's largest gaming platform. A hero, right? But do you know what Roblox's reward for him was? A permanent ban and a lawsuit.
Roblox said this: "Instead of stopping predators, we stop the people who stop predators."
This isn't just a one-off incident. There are over eight hundred child sexual abuse lawsuits pending against Roblox, and the world is furious. In today's video, we'll dig deep into the ugly face of this giant platform that ignores criminals and suppresses whistleblowers, and why this tragedy isn't a simple accident but was 'designed' from the start, ignoring safety for profit.
At the center of the case is a YouTuber named Schlep. He himself was a victim, having suffered a terrible experience with a famous Roblox developer as a child. The trauma haunted him into adulthood. He decided to take action to prevent other children from suffering the same pain. In collaboration with the police, he conducted an undercover investigation using a fake minor account. Through persistent tracking, he played a crucial role in the arrest of six criminals operating within Roblox.
Common sense dictates that Roblox should have given him a medal of appreciation. He was a hero who cleaned up their platform. But instead of praising him, Roblox deleted all his accounts and sent him a warning to stop his activities, citing a violation of their internal policy against vigilantism.
Now, witness the horrifying hypocrisy of Roblox. They were internally aware of over 13,000 incident reports on their platform. This was a more than four-fold increase from the previous year. The company that ignored these numerous warning signs and the cries of victims was quick to punish the YouTuber who caught the criminals himself.
This is like ignoring a burning house and gagging the person who called 911. When this news broke, the world erupted in anger. The hashtag #FreeSchlep took over Twitter, and users held protests within the Roblox game. Prominent YouTubers like Moist Cr1TiKaL called Roblox hypocrites. Eventually, even a member of the US Congress stepped in to demand safety measures from Roblox, and the company's stock value plummeted by a staggering twelve trillion won.
Schlep said in an interview, "My only goal in making the videos was to make Roblox aware of this issue. I had made numerous reports, but nothing happened. The only way I could do it was to bring this to the public." His actions were not for revenge, but a desperate cry to prevent further harm.
Ultimately, Schlep began a lawsuit against Roblox. It wasn't just about the account ban, but on behalf of the abuse he suffered as a child and the countless other victims like him. His lawyer revealed that they are currently handling over eight hundred similar cases.
So, why did this tragedy happen? Is it simply the deviance of a few bad users? No. The core of the lawsuit argues that Roblox was designed from the start with a structure that easily puts children at risk, all for the sake of maximizing profit.
From a PM's perspective, and as a former designer, let's look at these three intentional design flaws.
First, intentional laxity for growth. Until 2021, you could sign up for Roblox with just a username, password, and date of birth—no email verification required. Why? To make the sign-up process as simple as possible to quickly acquire new users. If children lied just a little about their age, they could unlock an unrestricted chat feature, allowing them to talk to adults without any limitations. This wasn't a mistake; it was a strategy to intentionally loosen safety measures for growth.
Second, a business model that induces addiction. The game currency, Robux, which stimulates children's gambling instincts, is at the heart of it. You need Robux to customize your avatar and buy rare items in Roblox, and many kids go so far as to say, "I'll do anything for Robux." Predators exploit this very psychology. Robux is used all too easily as bait to lure children and gain control over them. Roblox reaps massive profits from this structure but has thoroughly ignored the underlying dangers.
Third, outsourcing safety to cut costs. Roblox has 78 million daily active users, with over 50,000 messages exchanged every second. Yet, the staff managing this massive platform is only about 3,000 people. Compared to TikTok, it has one-third the users but only one-thirteenth the moderation staff. Furthermore, current and former employees testify that the company ignored requests for more resources and rejected proposals for safety features like pop-up warnings. Why? Because investing in safety is a cost, while increasing users is revenue. They intentionally ignored safety for growth.
These loopholes are glaringly obvious. While words like "Snapchat" or "Discord" are filtered, they can be easily bypassed by using emojis or slightly altering the spelling. It blocks phone numbers written in digits but fails to block them when written out in words. This is strong evidence that Roblox was aware of the risk of users being lured to external platforms but chose to leave it unaddressed.
Roblox will likely use Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act as a shield in court, the law that states platforms are not liable for content posted by users. But this lawsuit is different. It's not about user actions, but about the platform's own negligence and false advertising. The legal team argues that "Roblox designed a dangerous platform, falsely marketed it to parents as a safe educational platform, and ignored clear warning signs." And a court has already ruled that 'false statements' are not protected by this law.
This is precisely why this lawsuit is so important. If the plaintiffs win, it will set a historic precedent, making it impossible not only for Roblox but for all major platforms to evade their responsibility to protect users, especially children. It will be a wake-up call for Big Tech companies that have been hiding behind the excuse of "we are just intermediaries" while raking in huge profits.
Now, for the real question. What comes first: protecting the platform's image and growth, or protecting user safety? What do you think of Roblox's actions? Is this the platform's responsibility, or just the deviance of a few users? Let me know your thoughts in the comments.
If today's content gave you a chance to think about the social responsibilities beyond technology, and if you want to keep getting these raw insights, don't forget to subscribe and like. I'll see you again soon with more growth in the next video.
Watch the Video
This post is based on our YouTube video. Watch it for more details!
Originally published on YouTube: 10/27/2025