Ansible에서 Terraform으로: Infrastructure as Code 마이그레이션 경험. Git

2 min read6 views
ansibleterraforminfrastructure as codegitopsdevops

Ansible to Terraform: My Infrastructure as Code Migration Nightmare (and Triumph)

I’ve always been a sucker for shiny new things. But in the world of tech, chasing the latest trend can lead you down some seriously dark rabbit holes. My journey from Ansible to Terraform for Infrastructure as Code (IaC) was one such descent. I'm not saying Ansible is bad – it served its purpose – but the limitations became increasingly apparent as our infrastructure grew more complex.

Think of it like this: Ansible is like a highly skilled chef who meticulously prepares each dish from scratch. Terraform, on the other hand, is like a 3D printer for entire kitchens. Both get the job done, but one scales way better.

This isn't just a technical comparison; it's a story of frustration, late nights, and ultimately, a much more robust and efficient infrastructure. Let's dive in.

The Problem: Ansible's Growing Pains

For years, Ansible was our go-to for automating server provisioning and configuration. It's agentless, easy to learn, and worked great for smaller, simpler environments. But as our startup grew, so did our infrastructure. We moved from a handful of servers to hundreds, spread across multiple cloud providers. That's when the cracks started to show.

  • State Management Hell: Ansible doesn't inherently track the state of your infrastructure. It just executes commands. This meant that if something went wrong halfway through a playbook, you were left with a partially configured system and a whole lot of debugging. Imagine trying to bake a cake when the oven randomly shuts off halfway through – a recipe for disaster.

  • Idempotency Issues: Ansible aims to be idempotent, meaning running the same playbook multiple times should have the same result. However, achieving true idempotency can be tricky, especially with complex configurations. We often found ourselves having to write elaborate logic to ensure that tasks were only executed when necessary.

  • Scalability Limitations: As our infrastructure grew, Ansible playbooks became increasingly complex and difficult to manage. The execution time also increased significantly, making deployments slow and painful. It felt like trying to steer a battleship with a rowboat oar.

  • Lack of a Unified Infrastructure View: With Ansible, it was difficult to get a clear picture of the overall state of our infrastructure. We had to piece together information from various playbooks and configuration files, which was time-consuming and error-prone.

  • **The

Related Articles